Sign in
Good Tools · Fall 2026 · toolkit.allmeans.works

ARCH 273 — Revival Architecture

Fundamentals of Design I

Regenerative interventions on five Superfund sites, read across 200 years — a temporal site atlas, eco-lounge prototypes, an ensemble of eco-lounges, and a hundred-year graphic novel.

Post your work

The Archivist is this studio’s shared wall and its class record — one row per student, one column per class day, with your name and the date stamped on every upload. Posting weekly is half of every module grade. Sign in with your Illinois email.

The studio bench

Every Element is built on Proving Ground V7 — Four rectangles: this studio’s rectangles problem with the fourth rectangle in it — the focus, a table pushed up out of the plinth or a seating pit cut down into it — and the sun, the mass and the seated view all read from it. Proving Ground has seven versions behind one door, so follow this link and you will land on V7.

Modules 3 + 4 · Eco-Lounge Ensembles

Ensemble takes a study you saved in Proving Ground V7 and copies it nine times across the real ground of your site, then runs the copies through the organizations — grid, staggered grid, linear, axial, centralized, radial, cluster, contour, chain, and more — with the readings for each. It is Charrette 3A’s tool, from Mon Oct 12. Save your study in V7 first, in the same browser.

Week 8 — this week

  1. Mon Oct 12 — Assignment introduced. Phase 1 · Organize: start Charrette 3A, Typology Study — your Element through the nine organizations in Ensemble on your chosen site.
  2. Wed Oct 14 — Finish the Typology Study. Digital pin-up at 11 AM.
  3. Due Wed 10/14, 11 AM — each partner’s study through the nine organizations on the team’s site (a contact sheet of nine plans with their readings) · 5+ trace studies of the whole composition with scale figures · the team’s Element and its 2–3 organizations, one sentence each on why.
  4. The whole semester is in the calendar below; the brief in hand wins where they differ.

The studio

  • Regenerative interventions on five Superfund sites, read across 200 years — 100 back, 100 forward.
  • One evolving project in four modules, 25% each, plus a midterm and a final review.
  • Mon + Wed, 9:00–11:50 AM. Coordinator John Clark; co-teaching Andrew Weiss; TA group leaders.

How to work here

  • Most modules run on one main tool, demoed in class the day the module opens, plus a few supporting ones.
  • The tools are instruments, not oracles — real data and fast iteration in your hands; the judgment, and the verification, stay yours.
  • Most run entirely in your browser. The ones that spend an AI call ask you to sign in first.

Where work goes

  • Process work goes to the Archivist — one column per class day, named and dated for you. It replaces Miro this term, so there is no Miro board to keep in step. Final module documents go there too — one multi-page print-quality PDF per module, tagged final.
  • Every upload gets tagged, or it may be treated as missing: project arch273 · a module tag · a week tag · your site tag · a stage tag (process, pinup or final). JPG only — no vector PDFs. Post after every session; at minimum once a week.
  • Shared precedent images live in the class Class References wall. Sign in with your Illinois email to see it — it is the studio’s own wall, not a public one, so signed out there is nothing to render.
  • Readouts are imperial — feet, °F, acres. A number from an SI source carries the metric in parentheses so you can check it.

The assignment sheet — Modules 3 + 4

Eco-Lounge Ensembles · Stories of the Near Future, all 18 pages. Open any page for the slideshow — Prev / Next, the ← → keys, or swipe on a phone — or download the PDF to print.

⬇ Download the assignment sheet (PDF)

Settled since this sheet was printed (Oct 12) — where it says otherwise, these win: the ⅛″ model is at least 36″ × 36″, the whole 288′ site (not “approximately 20″ × 20″”, p. 4); final PDFs and the semester archive go to the Archivist, tagged final (not Google Drive, pp. 12–13); and there is no studio-map publish on Oct 28 for now (pp. 3, 10, 13).

Watch first

A walk through the three tools this studio leans on hardest — before the demo, or again after it.

Good Tools — Module 1 Demo — Surveyor, Relief & ArchivistJohn Clark · Illinois MediaSpace · Watch on Illinois MediaSpace

The four modules

One project, four builds. Each module names its final deliverable and the tools it calls for. Dates are on the calendar; the assignment brief in hand always wins.

Module 1

Temporal Site Atlas

Weeks 1–4 · review Mon Sept 14 · 25%

Tell your Superfund site’s story 100 years back and 100 forward in a composite experimental analysis drawing — built from cutout parts you layer and re-layer, physically or digitally, to test variations — plus a group 3D-printed site model, which is due Wed Sept 23, two weeks after the Atlas, so the FabShop queue has room. Surveyor demo Wed Aug 26; after class, run your site in Superfund mode and download terrain + boundary for Rhino. By Sun Aug 30, your first 5 claims verified or overturned, with primary sources — the tagged-claim verification (checking the AI’s claims against primary sources) is part of the assignment, not homework about the tool.

  • Surveyormain toolsign-in to run the AI claims

    Type in your site (the syllabus calls it Site Analysis) and it pulls the real public record — climate, terrain, hydrology, flood zones, the parcel boundary, and in Superfund mode the EPA cleanup file. Hard data arrives cited; the AI’s claims arrive tagged verified / unverified / suspect for you to check. Its exports drop measured terrain + boundary straight into Rhino and drawing layers into Illustrator, so the Atlas is drawn on real ground. The measured data, the exports and the map need no account; the tagged claims are an AI pass, so make your account before Wednesday — Sunday’s five verified claims come out of that pass.

  • ReliefSurveyor ground → physical site model

    The group site model, made from data: cut a chunk of the Surveyor’s measured ground — its presets are this studio’s exact setups (the TA section’s 27″ set model, cut into printer-bed tiles; Individual at 1/8″ or 1/4″) — and fabricate it as printed tiles, a waffle grid, stacked contours or fold-scored paper strips, with the mapped roads, water and buildings cut in.

  • A phone photo of a pencil drawing is grey, warped and dim; this turns it into clean black-on-white line work at print resolution, right in the browser. Bring it to the Sept 2 scanning clinic, and use it whenever hand work has to survive into the hybrid sheet.

Module 2

4 Rectangles — Gable Eco-Lounges

Weeks 4–7 · midterm Mon Oct 5 · due Fri Oct 9 · 25%

The game is 4 Rectangles: every study is a gable Eco-Lounge on your group’s Superfund site, made of four rectangles — a Roof ≤1,600 SF, a Room ≤800 SF inside it, a Plinth ≤1,200 SF, and a Gathering Space, a table pushed up out of the plinth or a conversation pit cut down into it, which is the focus of the whole thing. You change dimensions, positions, angles and amounts, never the DNA, and let the site’s forces inflect it — sun, wind, air, earth and mass, water, views — and the people who will gather there. Before Round 1, write three site-force goals as sentences — each a direction, a reason, and the evidence you will accept — and rank them.

Then three rounds of at least three, each pinned up and talked through before the next. Round 1 · Intuition: three studies in Rhino and three Bristol models, pinned up Wed Sept 16. Round 2 · Test + Remix: every study into Proving Ground V7 on your site, read against your goals, then new versions that answer the readouts — one of them a remix of a classmate’s Round 1 study — twelve or more posted by Sun Sept 27. Round 3 · Curate + Draw: choose the final nine, each with a number and a sentence against your goals, and draw every one by the same process. The board and the nine models go up at the Mon Oct 5 midterm; Modules 1 and 2 are due for grading Fri Oct 9. These are singular structures — the Ensemble comes after, in Module 3.

  • Proving Groundmain toolFormerly Crucible (the ARCH 273 syllabus’s name). Nine versions behind one door: V1 Bench · V2 Grounds (the five Superfund sites) · V3 Live · V4 Solver (V7’s bench, every variable walked as the forces cycle; its classic Council one link away) · V5 Freehand · V6 Site forces (the full-service bench) · V7 Four rectangles (ARCH 273’s version, with the focus, and a switch that moves the drawn air to the day and hour) · V9 Century (V7’s bench weathered over a hundred years — decay, mould, rust, frost and soil loss, year by year) · V10 Genetic (V7’s bench bred by a genetic algorithm — a population selected, crossed and mutated, every knob of the search on the page, picks kept in a gallery)

    Round 2’s bench — V7 · Four rectangles, which this row opens (the syllabus calls the tool Crucible). Rebuild a study on the 4 Rectangles jig, which keeps the rectangles inside their rules for you in feet — except the roof: V7 lets the ridge height govern, so a low ridge over a steep pitch can drive the eave down through the walls and into the plinth or the ground, and a warning box on the model names what broke, in feet. Or import your Rhino file (.3dm, .obj, .stl, .ply or .glb) with the rectangles on named layers — Plinth, Walls, Roof, Focus (put “table” or “pit” in the name) and Glazing, one flat surface in every opening, skylights included; the V7 student manual lists every layer and what the engine does with it. Pick your site under The ground (one of the five studio sites, or Load coordinate for a pin you saved in the Surveyor) — until you do, every number is read on a placeholder site. Turn the building with Rotate the building (north stays true north), and read what each study actually does: sun on the floor and on the gathering space, the view from the seat, wind, stack ventilation, the mass the plinth banks, the ground under it. When it proposes a move you disagree with, keep your composition and write down why; the readout becomes the DATA frame on your board.

  • Sun & Shadow StudySolar geometry + cast shadows

    The evidence for a SUN goal: a sun study at both solstices and the equinox, 9 AM / noon / 3 PM, at your site’s latitude — real NOAA solar geometry, a sunrise-to-sunset animation, PNG export.

  • ScoreboardCompare schemes · one weighted table

    Round 3’s curation move: twelve or more studies down to the final nine, each with a number and a sentence against your goals. Put the close calls side by side — up to six at a time — in one honest table: every cell links back to the tool that measured it, and no ranking appears until you say what matters.

  • Hatch & PochéArchitectural hatch fills

    The assignment is black and white — the B/W swatches, or your own made here: real hatch and poché patterns scaled true to your drawing scale, exported as SVG or PNG.

Module 3

Eco-Lounge Ensembles

Phases 1–3 · Mon Oct 12 – Wed Nov 4 · teams of 2 · 25%

One assignment, nine weeks, five phases, running through Module 4: design an Ensemble of eco-lounge pavilions for a 100-year remediation and monitoring center on your Superfund site, then tell the story of its life as an architectural graphic novel. The Ensemble is a community lounge, habitat for non-human life, and storage for the equipment that remediates the site — no other program — and it is built in successive campaigns, each adjusting its materiality and siting to how the soil, water, canopy and community actually change.

You work in teams of two (one team of three in a section with an odd number). This is a rework, not a cold start: put both partners’ Module 2 studies and their midterm critiques on the table, decide which notes you are acting on and which you are answering, and combine two study ideas into one new prototypical form, the Element. You should be able to say which move came from which partner, and why it survived. The Ensemble is nine Elements that share one DNA but vary in scale, proportion, orientation and arrangement, on a site no larger than 288′ × 288′.

The rules, in one breath. Every Element is the 4 Rectangles — Plinth, Walls, Roof, Focus — plus an optional fifth, a Greenhouse, and some walls may be glazed; every other aperture is open to the weather. Any rectangle may rotate. Nine Elements (twelve at most; some may merge), each at most 1,200 SF of interior floor. 2–3 doors, 7′ tall and no more than 15′ long; 1–2 skylights, no cutting-box side over 12′; every aperture a box cut. One ridge per Element, no higher than 30′ (split it for a clerestory); a second floor at most half the footprint; one curved surface, a circular arc. Pile foundations, 12″ diameter at most, about 4′ on center. The plinths join into one walking surface, ramps no steeper than 1:20 and no snaky paths. Furniture and entourage come from the same design language.

Phase 1 · Organize (week 8) — Charrette 3A, Typology Study, from Mon Oct 12. In Ensemble, walk the site box onto the landform you want (a tailings pile, a riverbank, a marsh edge, a berm), load each partner’s Module 2 study, and run it through all nine assignment-sheet organizations; then break the symmetry. Draw on trace at 1/16″ or ⅛″ = 1′-0″ in parallel, and name one physical and one social force the Element answers. Digital pin-up Wed Oct 14 at 11 AM. Phase 2 · Ground + Measure (weeks 9–10) — Charrette 3B, Define the Performative Measure: name the measure that shows those forces are answered, and develop the Ensemble until it holds — overlays on trace, three Ensemble iterations in cardstock and Rhino Mon Oct 19, section iterations to the ground Wed Oct 21, the progress review Mon Oct 26 at 9 AM, and the final Rhino model Wed Oct 28. Phase 3 · Build + Draw (week 11): the ⅛″ = 1′-0″ physical model, at least 36″ × 36″, Mon Nov 2, built to be weathered; clean photographs in the photo studio Wed Nov 4; then two section perspectives and a plan, drafted by Mon Nov 9 because the storyboards are built from them. Upload to the Archivist every day you work, tagged module-3.

  • Ensemblemain toolsign-in to write your own ruleNine copies of one Proving Ground study, arranged — Module 3's layout families on a real chat pile

    Phase 1’s tool, and the measure for Phase 2. Pick your studio site and walk the box onto your landform with the key map or the Shift sliders (it opens on the summit of Tar Creek’s tallest chat pile). Under Study, load a Module 2 study: Ensemble reads the studies you saved in Proving Ground V7 with Save study, in the same browser — a study saved on another computer has to be saved again on this one; with none saved, the V7 default loads. Then cycle the nine organizations, export each plan as SVG or a screenshot, and break the symmetry: Rotation, Drift and its seed, drag a lounge by hand, switch on the ordering grid. The How to use tab holds the “Nine ways to arrange” sheets, loadable as drawn. The readings are your Phase 2 evidence — the fall under every plinth, cut and fill, sun, air and daylight per lounge, the two-winds study, a design storm over the whole Ensemble — and its Rhino export (surfaces or mesh) is a legitimate start on the Oct 28 model, which you then take further: connect the plinths, add the ramps and stairs, design what holds the cantilevers. It arranges and measures; it does not decide — adopt a move only when you can say why, and note what you overrode. Everything runs without an account except writing your own rule in words, which is an AI call.

  • Proving GroundFormerly Crucible (the ARCH 273 syllabus’s name). Nine versions behind one door: V1 Bench · V2 Grounds (the five Superfund sites) · V3 Live · V4 Solver (V7’s bench, every variable walked as the forces cycle; its classic Council one link away) · V5 Freehand · V6 Site forces (the full-service bench) · V7 Four rectangles (ARCH 273’s version, with the focus, and a switch that moves the drawn air to the day and hour) · V9 Century (V7’s bench weathered over a hundred years — decay, mould, rust, frost and soil loss, year by year) · V10 Genetic (V7’s bench bred by a genetic algorithm — a population selected, crossed and mutated, every knob of the search on the page, picks kept in a gallery)

    Still the bench for one Element: the merged Element is rebuilt and tested here before it is copied nine times, and its ground readings on any single Element are the check on Phase 2’s sections to the ground. Save every version with Save study so Ensemble can load it.

  • DetailerAssembly study · walls, roofs, floors · thermal, moisture, matter

    Each team picks a construction, tectonic and material system and draws it in the section perspectives. Build that wall, roof and floor here, layer by layer, and read its hatched section, weight and embodied carbon before you draw its grain at ⅛″.

  • Hatch & PochéArchitectural hatch fills

    The final Rhino model takes simple black-and-white line-drawing textures — the provided templates or your own in the same style. Make your own here, scaled true to ⅛″ = 1′-0″, and export them as PNG for Rhino or SVG for Illustrator.

Module 4

Stories of the Near Future

Phases 4–5 · Mon Nov 9 – FINAL REVIEW Wed Dec 9 · 25%

The Ensemble becomes an architectural graphic novel: not a static building at the moment of its construction but a generational system for remediation, its story running from the life of the place before it to its life and mission 100 years later, with characters on the site and in the buildings. You may keep working as a team (and deliver proportionally more spreads) or split up; either way, every novel carries all the required drawings and content. The heavy lifting is Rhino, Illustrator, Photoshop and Twinmotion — and the bulk of your time and the majority of the ink belong to the architecture. No blue skies, no Kentucky bluegrass, no park-like plantings.

Phase 4 · Weather + Storyboard (weeks 12–13). Mon Nov 9: act on the Oct 26 review in the Rhino model, the weathering session starts — stain, sand, break, grow, silt — and so does the novel: storyboard spreads that incorporate orthography. Look at the references and the graphic novels on display in Ricker, then iterate every spread on trace at least three times, at the correct aspect ratio; draft layouts are due Wed Nov 11. Remake the section perspectives and plan with more care, draw an asset page of your own entourage, and capture the perspective set. Mon Nov 16: aged model photographs in the storyboard, at least three overlay swatch treatments on a model photograph, the plan and the section, and one composite perspective sample. Wed Nov 18: the draft novel, about 75%, printed at full scale. Fall Break, Nov 23–27, has nothing due. Phase 5 · Produce (weeks 15–16). Mon Nov 30: the novel and the physical model at 80 to 90%, with test prints — leave with a written correction list. Wed Dec 2 is production. The print deadline is Mon Dec 7 — PDFs to the Archivist by 5 PM, tagged final; nobody prints the night before the review. FINAL REVIEW Wed Dec 9: all of the work. The complete semester archive goes to the Archivist by end of day Fri Dec 11. Upload to the Archivist every day you work, tagged module-4.

The semester calendar

Every session, Mon + Wed 9:00–11:50 AM, with what's due that week. Reviews and due days are washed amber. Subject to change — the brief in hand wins.

WkMondayWednesdayDue that week
Module 1 · Temporal Site Atlas · weeks 1–3 · 25%
1Aug 24 — Kickoff: syllabus, TA groups, site assignments; Archivist standards + tagging.Aug 26 — Module 1 brief · Surveyor demo · Exercise A: 10 layout sketches in class.Sun 8/30 — Exercise A + research dump + first 5 claims verified.
2Aug 31 — Illustrator composite workflow; choose your layout.Sept 2 — Scanning + plotting clinic · Exercise B: 5 print-resolution swatches.Sun 9/6 — Atlas at ~75% + remaining verified claims.
3Sept 7 — No class (Labor Day). Plot + trim over the weekend.Sept 9 — Review of Assignment 1 progress · work day / pin-up.Sun 9/13 — First 3 Rectangles compositions.
Module 2 · 4 Rectangles — Gable Eco-Lounges · weeks 4–7 · 25%
4Sept 14 — REVIEW OF ASSIGNMENT 1 · Round 1 · Intuition: write your three site-force goals · design charrette, ten plan diagrams in thirty minutes · start 3 Rhino studies + 3 Bristol models.Sept 16 — Round 1 pin-up: 3 Rhino studies + 3 models at the start of class · lecture: The Gable Decides · Proving Ground V7 demo · pick the study you will remix.Sun 9/20 — Round 1 posted: 3 Rhino studies in the two named views, 3 models photographed, your 3 goals, the study you are remixing.
5Sept 21 — Round 2 · Test + Remix: every Round 1 study into Proving Ground V7 on your site · one number that moved per study · 3+ new versions, one of them the remix.Sept 23 — Pin-up of the readouts: each study beside the one it beat, the remix before / after · one model to the 3D printer · group site models due.Sun 9/27 — 12+ studies (6 from Round 1, 6+ from Round 2), readouts for every Round 2 study, and the move you refused, with the reason.
6Sept 28 — Round 3 · Curate + Draw: choose the final nine, each with a number and a sentence against your goals · Round 3 talk · start the drawing process on all nine.Sept 30 — Physical models of the nine in their 6″ frames, two photos each · DATA frames written · desk crits on the board.Sun 10/4 — the 36″×36″ board on the Print Template, PDF to the Archivist · the nine models ready to pin.
7Oct 5 — MIDTERM REVIEW in TBH — the Module 1 Atlases (final, with drafts + process sketches) and the Module 2 board, the nine physical models pinned to it, and process sketches.Oct 7 — Rework drawings + models per the midterm review · Fri Oct 9 — Grad reviews.Fri 10/9 — Modules 1 + 2 submission deadline for grading: final PDFs to the Archivist, tagged final.
Module 3 · Eco-Lounge Ensembles · Phases 1–3 · weeks 8–11 · teams of 2 · 25%
8Oct 12 — Assignment introduced. Phase 1 · Organize: start Charrette 3A, Typology Study — your Element through the nine organizations in Ensemble on your chosen site.Oct 14 — Finish the Typology Study. Digital pin-up at 11 AM.Wed 10/14, 11 AM — each partner’s study through the nine organizations on the team’s site (a contact sheet of nine plans with their readings) · 5+ trace studies of the whole composition with scale figures · the team’s Element and its 2–3 organizations, one sentence each on why.
9Oct 19 — Phase 2 · Ground + Measure: start Charrette 3B, Define the Performative Measure. Trace-paper overlays on printed plans and sections from the Typology Study. Three Ensemble iterations in cardstock and Rhino due.Oct 21 — Section iterations to clarify the relationship to the ground.Mon 10/19 — three Ensemble iterations in cardstock and Rhino · Wed 10/21 — section iterations.
10Oct 26 — Review of progress at 9 AM. Finalize the design; continue study models.Oct 28 — Final digital model. Start the physical model.Mon 10/26, 9 AM — progress pin-up · Wed 10/28 — the final Rhino model.
11Nov 2 — Phase 3 · Build + Draw: model at ⅛″ = 1′-0″ in non-plastic materials, at least 36″ × 36″.Nov 4 — Clean model photography.Mon 11/2 — the ⅛″ model, 36″ × 36″ or larger · Wed 11/4 — clean model photographs · draft section perspectives + plan by Mon 11/9.
Module 4 · Stories of the Near Future · Phases 4–5 · weeks 12–16 · 25%
12Nov 9 — Phase 4 · Weather + Storyboard. Model weathering session starts. Start the graphic novel: storyboard spreads that incorporate orthography.Nov 11 — Draft layouts of the spreads due.Wed 11/11 — draft layouts of the spreads.
13Nov 16 — Model photographs incorporated into the storyboard. Swatch samples: at least three overlay iterations on model photographs, plan and section (color, lineweight, pattern, text, style).Nov 18 — Pin-up of the draft graphic novel, about 75% complete.Mon 11/16 — model photos in the storyboard, 3+ swatch samples, one composite perspective sample · Wed 11/18 — the draft graphic novel, ~75%, printed at full scale.
14Nov 23 — No class: Fall Break.Nov 25 — No class: Fall Break.Nov 23–27 — Fall Break. Nothing due; asset pages and entourage are good break work.
15Nov 30 — Phase 5 · Produce. Pin-up of the graphic novel and the physical model, both at 80 to 90%. Bring test prints.Dec 2 — Production: act on the corrections.Mon 11/30 — the graphic novel and the physical model at 80–90%, with test prints.
16Dec 7 — Submission deadline for printing; PDFs to the Archivist by 5 PM.Dec 9 — FINAL REVIEW. Presentation of all work.Mon 12/7, 5 PM — graphic novel + drawing PDFs to the Archivist, tagged final, final prints sent · Fri 12/11 — the complete semester archive to the Archivist, end of day.

Goals & grading

The studio's five throughlines, and the four lenses every module is graded through.

The five throughlines, in the studio’s own words: Site + Time Literacy, Iterative Form-Finding, Systems Thinking, Hybrid Representation and Critical Collaboration.

Grading is 50/50 process/product, through four lenses — Completeness · Clarity · Craft · Resolution. Clarity is the one the toolkit is built around: “Can a reviewer understand what you made, how it works, and why you made it — without you narrating?” Every tool here leaves a trail — tagged claims, declared goals, written reasons — so your judgment is on the record, not just in your head.

The record, references & reviews

Where daily work lands, where the studio's shared images live, and how to prep for the four reviews.

  • Archivistsign-in

    The studio wall — one row per student, one column per class day, deliverable columns closing the right-hand end. Click a cell in your own row, upload, caption; every cell carries its own TA and classmate comments. A day’s column closes to students at 9:00 AM the next class day, so post before class. Sign in and the wall finds your row — or asks your name once. One-off work goes to the Archivist (sign in), and the teaching team’s QR drops (sign in) will appear as codes taped to the wall.

  • The studio’s shared image wall. Precedents, site photographs, drawings worth stealing from — everyone adds, and the wall is ordered by who posted: the teaching team first, then the TAs, then the studio. Bring anything you find here instead of letting it die in your downloads folder. Sign in to see it — the wall is the studio’s own, not a public one, so signed out there is literally nothing to render. It is a second page of the Librarian (sign in), which will identify and catalogue a single image in far more depth.

  • Criticsign-in

    Review prep for the Oct 5 midterm, the Oct 26 progress review and the Dec 9 final review: build a critic persona, pull your project down to a defensible thesis, and rehearse the questions a jury will ask. One synthetic position among many — never a substitute for your human critics.

When you're stuck

The Coach (sign in) tutors Rhino, Grasshopper and the Adobe suite — it gives you the real answer at your level and explains the move, so you can do it again next week without asking. The Skills Map shows where a missing skill sits before you go learn it, and Python Scripts has copy-paste snippets for this studio’s Rhino load — Make2D, unroll, sun studies, STL for the FabShop.

The stance, from the syllabus

They are instruments, not oracles: they put real data and fast iteration in your hands, and they leave the judgment — and the verification — to you.

New to the toolkit? Start with How to use — the shared conventions and every tool’s steps in one document — or the Overview of the whole toolkit. The glossary defines the words these steps use.

Curious what is actually happening when you click? Inside the toolkit explains how these tools run in your browser, why the files you drop in are never uploaded, where the site is hosted and how it was built — and how you can already fork, edit and version these tools yourself.

Teaching ARCH 273? The faculty room is the teaching team’s private page — shared references, images, notes and the team’s Google Docs. It opens only for the ARCH 273 teaching team — ask a colleague there for an invite link.